Escort Radar Forum  

Go Back   Escort Radar Forum > News > News Articles


Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old August 24th, 2011
Jerry Lee Jerry Lee is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 75
Default About Face in Houston

Council votes to turn off cameras

The City Council passed a resolution today to turn off the city’s red-light cameras immediately. It also repealed the city ordinance that authorizes use of cameras in general.

Only Councilwoman Sue Lovell, who has repeatedly warned that such a vote shouldn’t be taken without knowing how much it could cost the city in potential legal damages, cast the only vote against the resolution.

The resolution is non-binding. The mayor has the authority to turn the cameras off herself. However, City Attorney David Feldman said it will help him in federal court to have a united City Council behind him. He said he expects that the red-light camera vendor, American Traffic Solutions, will ask a judge to enjoin the city from turning off the cameras.

Feldman said he and Police Chief Charles McClelland had already prepared an order to ATS asking the company to shut off the cameras at 12:01 p.m. ATS attorney Andy Taylor said that could take several days.

“It’s time now that the people rejoice. The City Council has finally voted and this mayor has voted to do what we had asked them to do last November and that was to honor the will of the people and to take down these cameras,” said Michael Kubosh, an organizer of the ballot initiative through which voters citywide rejected the cameras.

The repeal ordinance essentially outlaws the use of red-light cameras in Houston.

Taylor confirmed that the company will seek to block the turn-off in federal court. ATS will argue that the Council’s action is invalid and void.

“If this is held to be invalid, then the cameras stay up,” Taylor said.

ATS has said that if the city shuts off the cameras, it could cost the city $25 million in damages. Yesterday, Feldman called that estimate ”a pure fantasy.”
Jerry Lee
Houston, TX
Honda CR-V (mine) LI dual+9500ix
Honda CR-V (wife) LI dual+9500ix
Both are silver with Veil on the front plate
Reply With Quote
Old August 25th, 2011
flylow7f39 flylow7f39 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,243

Article from:

Houston, Texas Pulls Plug on Red Light Camera Program
City council in Houston, Texas votes to repeal red light camera program permanently.

Mayor Annise D. ParkerThe long battle over the red light camera program in Houston, Texas ended Wednesday. The city council voted 14-1 to repeal the ordinance that granted American Traffic Solutions (ATS) the right to issue automated tickets at fifty intersections throughout the country's fourth largest city.

"This is a total victory for the voters of Houston," Citizens Against Red Light Cameras spokesman Philip Owens told TheNewspaper. "The only shame is it took too long to get where we are. Today was more of an exercise in political theater but a win is a win."

The anti-camera group successfully brought a charter amendment on the red light camera issue before voters in November, and a solid majority rejected photo ticketing. ATS refused to accept the public's verdict, which meant the loss of $3 million a year in revenue. The company found a federal judge willing to overturn the ballot choice (view ruling), giving Mayor Annise D. Parker an excuse to turn the cameras back on. Feeling heat from the public, Parker backed off and decided it would be best to buy their way out of the contract with ATS, which does not expire until 2014. ATS has claimed the city will owe $25 million if the cameras are shut off.

"We are prepared to pay a reasonable settlement, but what that settlement is is undetermined," Parker said. "We think they're on the lower end. ATS -- their number keeps growing... If we are in fact told by a judge to pay it, we will figure a way to pay it."

The council adopted a measure insisting the cameras not only be shut off, but permanently removed as soon as possible in accordance with the law. Judge Lynn N. Hughes issued a management order last year at the request of ATS forcing the cameras to remain up until the case is finally resolved. Houston had agreed to the ATS request.

"I'm going to go back into federal court and ask the judge to rescind his management order so that the cameras can come down in accordance with the contract," City Attorney David Feldman said. "I have no reason to believe the judge would refuse my request to rescind the order."

Under the contract, ATS would be required to take down the cameras within 45 days at their expense if Judge Hughes lifts his order.

"There's ample precedent for cities taking down the cameras," Feldman said. "For every contract ATS seems to enter into -- just following it on the Net -- there's a city taking the cameras down and getting out of the contract."
Reply With Quote
Old August 25th, 2011
Rocky2's Avatar
Rocky2 Rocky2 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,659

It's about time they turned them off and took them down !!!

Radar Detectors: Redline, 9500i, 9500ix, 8500 X50 (S7), Rx-65 (M4), V1 (3.819), Escort Max, 8500x50 Black
Jammers: Blinder M27
Radio Shack Pro-107
Radio Shack Pro-106

My Detector Videos
Reply With Quote
Old August 26th, 2011
powerpickle's Avatar
powerpickle powerpickle is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,244

Yes,take them down!!!!
The will of the people should out weigh city contracts with companies that are paid for with citizens money. that doesn't even count fraudulent tickets costing tax payers more than the contract itself.
Curiosity was framed,ignorance killed the cat
MAX/Redline/Solo S3/V1 3.892/8500 X50 (S7) RX65 (S7) 8500 X50 Black/LI dual
Won an Ipad3 from Escort
Reply With Quote
Old August 27th, 2011
mfs165's Avatar
mfs165 mfs165 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 751

Originally Posted by powerpickle View Post
Yes,take them down!!!!
The will of the people should out weigh city contracts with companies that are paid for with citizens money. that doesn't even count fraudulent tickets costing tax payers more than the contract itself.
The City of Los Angeles CA did the same thing. They found out that the courts determined that paying the fine was was not Mandatory. Something to do with faceing your accuser. They were also loseing a bundle. It seems that the contractor was taking alot more fees from those who payed the fine than the City was getting.
<a href= target=_blank></a>
9500ix (conversion)
8500 X50
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2018 Escort Inc.