Escort Radar Forum  

Go Back   Escort Radar Forum > News > News Articles

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 1 Week Ago
flylow7f39 flylow7f39 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,745
Default SeaTac, Washington Dumps Red Light Cameras

Full article at http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/63/6318.asp

Instead of dumping Redflex, the SeaTac, Washington city council decides to dump red light cameras entirely.

"...When it came time to ratify the deal on Tuesday, however, the council surprised the staff by deciding 4 to 3 to reverse course and pull the plug on the cameras for good.

A number of objections were raised during Tuesday's council meeting, including the possibility of unintended consequences from issuing 81 percent to out-of-town drivers in the home of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.

"We had a bunch of emails from people when they saw this on the agenda," councilman Rick Forschler explained. "We rely on people coming from somewhere else to SeaTac for our economic development. If we annoy them to the point that they don't want to come here and they go somewhere else to stay in hotels, it's potentially impacting our economic development.""
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 1 Week Ago
flylow7f39 flylow7f39 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,745
Default

From http://seatacblog.com/2017/10/11/sea...ment-with-k-s/

"The Council rejected 4 to 3 the city renewing red light cameras when the current contract expires at the end of this year."

~

"Siefkes said the cameras were nothing but a visitor’s tax since most tickets apparently go to out of towners.

“I’m against that,” he said, adding that if the city does sign a contract next year with the new vendor, it would cost $360,000 to get out of the five year agreement. It’s wrong for the city to have such a cost if it should change its mind.

Councilmember Peter Kwon said information online about the cameras is either marketing oriented or just people not liking the cameras. The pros or cons were based on either whether they produce revenue and whether public safety is enhanced. He said he could not find any city that operated cameras at a loss to improve public safety.

“It is all about the money, that is very clear,” Kwon said."

Last edited by flylow7f39; 1 Week Ago at 02:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2017 Escort Inc.